Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Front Neurol ; 15: 1303995, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38504799

RESUMEN

Purpose: Stroke is the second leading cause of global adult mortality and the primary cause of disability. A rapid assessment by a neurologist for general and reperfusion treatments in ischemic strokes is linked to decreased mortality and disability. Telestroke assessment is a strategy that allows for neurological consultations with experienced professionals, even in remote emergency contexts. No randomized studies have compared face-to-face neurological care outcomes with telestroke care. Whether neurologists in an institution achieve better results remotely than in person is also unknown. This study aimed to compare mortality and other outcomes commonly measured in stroke protocols for stroke patients assessed by a neurologist via face-to-face evaluations and telestroke assessment. Methods: Observational single-center retrospective study from August/2009 to February/2022, enrolling 2,689 patients with ischemic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, and intracerebral hemorrhage. Group 1 (G1) comprised 2,437 patients with in-person neurological assessments, and Telemedicine Group 2 (G2) included 252 patients. Results: The in-person group had higher admission NIHSS scores (G1, 3 (0; 36) vs. G2, 2 (0; 26), p < 0.001). The door-to-groin puncture time was lower in the in-person group than in the telestroke group (G1, 103 (42; 310) vs. G2, 151 (109; 340), p < 0.001). The telestroke group showed superior metrics for door-to-imaging time, symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation rate in ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis, hospital stay duration, higher rates of intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy, and lower mortality. Symptomatic hemorrhagic transformation rate was smaller in the group evaluated via telestroke (G1, 5.1% vs. G2, 1.1%, p = 0.016). Intravenous thrombolysis and mechanical thrombectomy rates were significantly higher in telestroke group: (G1, 8.6% vs. G2, 18.2%, p < 0.001 and G1, 5.1% vs. G2, 10.4%, p = 0.002, respectively). Mortality was lower in the telestroke group than in the in-person group (G1, 11.1% vs. G2, 6.7%, p = 0.001). The percentage of patients with an mRS score of 0-2 at discharge was similar in both groups when adjusting for NIHSS score and age. Conclusion: The same neurological emergency team may assess stroke patients in-person or by telemedicine, with excellent outcome metrics. This study reaffirms telestroke as a safe tool in acute stroke care.

2.
Int J Emerg Med ; 16(1): 84, 2023 Nov 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37953263

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, we find ourselves in very unexpected and challenging circumstances facing the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact of the new coronavirus pandemic probably affected everyone's mental health, and people with pre-existing mental disorders may have an aggravated disease condition, leading to a suicide attempt. Pandemic also increased the use of direct-to-consumer telemedicine (TM) exponentially, and consequently, it was expected that cases of attempted suicide could be evaluated remotely. Some TM centers have adapted safety protocols from psychiatric guidelines for managing these patients. However, there is a lack of evidence of the effectiveness of follow-up by TM for patients at high risk for suicide, and there is no consensus on what action should be taken vis-à-vis the patient who requests immediate help remotely. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we reported a case of a TM evaluation of a patient's suicidal ideation in a direct-to-consumer telemedicine emergency center, describing the conduct taken in the face of this situation. We also discuss the importance of planning the emergency telemedicine center for situations of risk of suicide. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine centers should be prepared for direct consumer assessment of suicidal ideation. Current management suggestions include recognizing the risk profile through institutional training and software skills and immediate referral for face-to-face assessment, encouraging continuous monitoring until the admission and active recruitment of family members or closest friends.

3.
Arch Acad Emerg Med ; 10(1): e75, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36426173

RESUMEN

Cyanosis is typically a sign of a potentially life-threatening condition in the emergency department and requires immediate workup and treatment. This case report highlights the diagnostic reasoning and clinical approach to cocaine- and volatile nitrite-induced methemoglobinemia (MHG). MHG is a rare, life-threatening cause of cyanosis. The diagnosis must be suspected in the emergency department in the presence of hypoxia and cyanosis disproportionate to cardiopulmonary repercussions and refractory to oxygen supplementation. Acquired causes are more prevalent than genetics, and recreational drugs should be highly suspected. Despite the rarity of this situation, cyanosis precipitants and the specificities of each hemoglobinopathy are reviewed in this article.

4.
Int J Infect Dis ; 105: 130-134, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33578013

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the antibiotic prescription rate in low-risk patients evaluated at a telemedicine program that adopts antibiotic stewardship protocols. METHODS: Adult patients who accessed a single direct-to-consumer telemedicine center (Jan/2019-Feb/2020) were retrospectively enrolled. Diseases amenable to antimicrobial treatment were classified under five diagnostic groups: upper respiratory tract infection (URI), acute pharyngotonsillitis (PT), acute sinusitis (AS), urinary tract infection (UTI), and acute diarrhea (AD). Physicians were trained on and advised to strictly follow the current guideline recommendations supported by institutional antibiotic stewardship protocols, readily available online during consultations. We analyzed the antibiotic prescription rate among patients, referral rate, and antibiotic class through descriptive statistics. RESULTS: A total of 2328 patients were included in the study. A total of 2085 (89·6%) patients were discharged with usual recommendations, medication (if needed), and instructions about red flags, while 243 (10·4%) were referred to a face-to-face consultation. Among the discharged patients, the antibiotic prescription rates by the diagnostic group were URI - 2·5%, PT - 35·0%, AS - 51·8%, UTI - 91.6%, and AD - 1·6%. In most cases, prescribed antibiotics were in line with institutional stewardship protocols. CONCLUSIONS: Low prescription rate of antibiotics can be achieved using antibiotic stewardship protocols at direct-to-consumer telemedicine consultations, showing high adherence to international guidelines. These results reinforce telemedicine as a cost-effective and safe strategy for the initial assessment of acute non-urgent symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Cooperación del Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Telemedicina , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Diarrea/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Derivación y Consulta , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sinusitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA